L’héritage français et européen du roman italien des années 1960 : un rendez-vous manqué
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie la place du roman étranger dans le champ littéraire italien, avec l’objectif de cerner les raisons expliquant l’intérêt que les romanciers associés à la Neoavanguardia portent aux travaux de leurs contemporains européens, et en particulier français. Dans une première partie, nous portons notre attention sur l’un des « événements » littéraires des années 1960, à savoir l’importation en Italie du Nouveau Roman. La deuxième partie de l’étude est consacrée au cas de l’écrivain Alberto Arbasino et à l’essai Certi romanzi qu’il publie en 1964. L’approche critique d’Arbasino relativement à divers modèles littéraires se comprend à la lumière de la situation historique de sa génération et permet d’interroger le rapport de celle-ci avec l’héritage romanesque européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".