Encadrement législatif et réglementaire de la valorisation des résidus miniers hors site au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DÉDICACEÀ ceux qui ont cru au potentiel scolaire d'une adolescente candidate au cheminement particulier : mes parents et ma tante Mado REMERCIEMENTSJe remercie mon directeur de recherche, professeur Li Li, d'avoir soutenu avec enthousiasme le choix d'étudier un sujet aussi peu commun en génie que l'encadrement législatif et réglementaire.Je suis très reconnaissante d'avoir eu un directeur de recherche qui fait de la promotion des projets de recherche de ses étudiants une priorité.Sans son aide, je n'aurais pas eu accès à autant d'information issue des professionnels de l'industrie, du gouvernement et d'autres institutions de recherche.Je tiens aussi à exprimer ma gratitude à M. Li Li ainsi qu'à mes codirecteurs, professeurs Thomas Pabst et Gérald Zagury, pour leur encadrement tout au long de ma formation et de mon projet de recherche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".