MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2959304478 · doi:10.4324/9780429265570-14

The Nep and Energy Policy: an Evaluation

2019· book-chapter· en· W2959304478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Bruce Doern, Glen Toner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The partial success is found in the revenue share aspects of the nep. The nep was successful to the extent that it did secure a higher share of revenues for the federal government, from about 7 percent to 16 percent, but short of the avowed goal of about 24 percent, because projected price increases failed to materialize. The full decade of energy policy shows the existence of much consultation, albeit grumpy consultation embellished with the normal expressions of dissatisfaction from those who did not get all that they wanted. The demand-side “off-oil” elements of the nep, aided by the recession and previous conservation efforts, have produced significant results in the form of a 22 percent reduction in oil demand between 1980 and 1983. In other respects, of course, Canada’s earlier energy history showed that there was also at times a dearth of analysis and knowledge, for example about future reserves, industry finances, and procurement decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHead and Neck AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207