MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2959501423 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa115

ALMA view of the Galactic super star cluster RCW 38 at 270 au resolution

2021· article· en· W2959501423 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyMinistry of Science and TechnologyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOutflowCluster (spacecraft)Angular resolution (graph drawing)Galactic CenterStar formationLine (geometry)Proper motionStar clusterBasso continuo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report millimeter/submillimeter continuum and molecular line observations of the Galactic super star cluster RCW 38, obtained from the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array with a minimum angular resolution of ${0{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}17}\times {0{^{\prime \prime }_{.}}15}$ (≃ 289 au × 255 au). The C18O image reveals many massive condensations embedded within filamentary structures extending along the northwest–southeast direction in the center of cluster. The condensations have sizes of 0.01–0.02 pc, H2 column densities of 1023–1024 cm−2, and H2 masses of 10–130 M⊙. In addition, the 233 GHz continuum image reveals two dense, small millimeter-sources with radii of 460 and 200 au (Source A and Source B). Source A is embedded within the most massive C18O condensation, whereas no counterpart is seen for Source B. The masses of Source A and Source B are estimated as 13 and 3 M⊙ at the optically thin limit, respectively. The C18O emission shows a velocity gradient of 2 km s−1 at the central 2000 au of Source A, which could be interpreted as a Keplerian rotation with a central mass of a few M⊙ or infall motion of gas. Further, the ALMA 12CO data reveal that Source A and Source B are associated with molecular outflows exhibiting maximum velocities of ∼30–70 km s−1. The outflows have short dynamical timescales of <1000 yr and high-mass outflow rates of ∼10−4–10−3 M⊙ yr−1. These observational signatures suggest an early evolutionary phase of the massive star formation in Source A and Source B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207