MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2959757568

Social-Psychological Effects of Park Ritrit Under the Natural Conditions of Megapolis

2008· article· en· W2959757568 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Irene Sibgatullina-Denis, O. Ryabov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Green Space and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)PsychologySocial psychologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Park ritrit is the part of an exclusive author’s method of resonance creation “Resonante Cokreation” (MRC, Sibgatullina, Grussl, 2002). Park ritrit (PR, Sibgatullina ) is some kind of ecological prevention of the citizens in a big city. Moreover it is a private instrument of psychoanalytical psychotherapy. The autonomy of park ritrit in the environment of megapolis defined with the help of special procedure solitude of a person in a city park. This parking procedure hasn’t got totally distinctive character but clinical and curativeaesthetic one. The citizen isn’t moving for long distances. Being in the city and developing park ritrit he can find the sphere for disposing to creative style of thinking and psychotherapy. The creative mechanism of park ritrit is presented in natural-science and material way. It’s very important that all transformations of psychical phenomena, processes, emotional experience etc that the citizen feels happen in park ritrit by themselves. It occurs according to the nature and in cooperation with natural atmosphere without therapeutist interference. Park-ritrit is totally different from any psychotherapeutic programming. The balanced psychical conditions of megapolis’ citizen are reflected in immediate and mediate nature of the park. We’re talking about some new production of consciousness. It is: - the spatial structure of parking sphere (visual human system is promoting this) - the emotional attitude toward the nature and the form of the park (emotional human sphere is promoting this) - the rational, symbolical meaning of the park ( the objective side of the park is promoting this) - the personal, spiritual attitude to solitude (the semantic transformation of architecture, rhythms, the problems of the city into the individual philosophy of the park is promoting this) The mission of park ritrit is varied. It is the cure, the increasing quality of life among the citizens, ecological prevention. Also it includes not medical prevention such as upbringing, education, design, advertising, fitness. The form of principles of park ritrit are personal or group psychotherapy, media-course, mediatraining, fitness-training. It’s very important to the people of New York, Moscow, Rome, Berlin, Toronto and other megapolis to have ability to self-regulation of consequence of the city tensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Green Space and Health→French-language works237,207→