Chapitre XVIII. Noirceur et paradoxes de la maîtrise dans Les Temps du Carcajou d’Yves Thériault
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Loin de le renier, le romancier québécois Yves Thériault disait assez crânement des Temps du Carcajou qu’il « occuperait un jour la place qu’il mérit[ait] dans l’énumération de ses œuvres ».Nous ne pouvons, encore à ce jour, qu’en accepter l’augure, pariant sur les forces d’un roman qui – par la cruauté de son sujet, la subtilité de sa stratégie narrative, la réconciliation de l’oralité la plus crue et d’une prenante poésie – n’est pas sans évoquer les chroniques romanesques du Giono de la maturité. Nous tenterons de montrer par quelles figures du maître, multiples et conflictuelles, le petit roman de 1966 est travaillé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".