Enzymes of early-diverging, zoosporic fungi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The secretome, the complement of extracellular proteins, is a reflection of the interaction of an organism with its host or substrate, thus a determining factor for the organism's fitness and competitiveness. Hence, the secretome impacts speciation and organismal evolution. The zoosporic Chytridiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Neocallimastigomycota, and Cryptomycota represent the earliest diverging lineages of the Fungal Kingdom. The review describes the enzyme compositions of these zoosporic fungi, underscoring the enzymes involved in biomass degradation. The review connects the lifestyle and substrate affinities of the zoosporic fungi to the secretome composition by examining both classical phenotypic investigations and molecular/genomic-based studies. The carbohydrate-active enzyme profiles of 19 genome-sequenced species are summarized. Emphasis is given to recent advances in understanding the functional role of rumen fungi, the basis for the devastating chytridiomycosis, and the structure of fungal cellulosome. The approach taken by the review enables comparison of the secretome enzyme composition of anaerobic versus aerobic early-diverging fungi and comparison of enzyme portfolio of specialized parasites, pathogens, and saprotrophs. Early-diverging fungi digest most major types of biopolymers: cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, chitin, and keratin. It is thus to be expected that early-diverging fungi in its entirety represents a rich and diverse pool of secreted, metabolic enzymes. The review presents the methods used for enzyme discovery, the diversity of enzymes found, the status and outlook for recombinant production, and the potential for applications. Comparative studies on the composition of secretome enzymes of early-diverging fungi would contribute to unraveling the basal lineages of fungi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".