MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960224986 · doi:10.36378/jtos.v1i1.2

RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM INFORMASI RUMAH KOST DAN KONTRAKAN TELUK KUANTAN

2018· article· id· W2960224986 on OpenAlexaff
Elgamar Syam

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL TEKNOLOGI DAN OPEN SOURCE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pemanfaatan Teknologi dan Informasi dalam pengembangan suatu bisnis sangat diperlukan pada zaman milenial sekarang ini, dengan adanya sentuhan teknologi maka bisnis atau usaha dapat bertahan dan berkembang menjadi lebih baik. Sementara mereka yang tetap bertahan menggunakan cara tradisional, maka akan tergerus oleh kemajuan teknologi itu sendiri. Salah satu contoh pengembangan bisnis digital adalah pemanfaatan sistem informasi digital dalam promosi rumah kost dan kontrakan yang ada di wilayah Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi (Teluk Kuantan) Riau. Sehingga dengan adanya sistem ini para pemilik rumah kost dan kontrakan dapat mempromosikan huniannya melalui sistem informasi yang dibangun. Sistem ini menawarkan kemudahan bagi sipencari rumah kost dan kontrakan untuk melakukan penyewaan. Begitu juga dengan pemilik kost, maka dengan mudah menawarkan rumah kost dan kontrakan yang dimiliki agar dapat disewa dan dihuni oleh sipencari rumah kost, tentunya pembuat sistem juga akan mendapatkan keuntungan dari setiap transaksi yang dilakukan. Sistem informasi ini, memberikan gambaran jelas kepada si pencari rumah kost dan kontrakan dalam memilih hunian yang mereka lihat di halaman sistem informasi ini sesuai dengan selera dan kebutuhan mereka masing-masing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL TEKNOLOGI DAN OPEN SOURCESame topicInformation Retrieval and Data MiningFrench-language works237,207