Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a thematizing of sobriety as a characteristic of Christian spirituality through words or instructions from the monastic discourses of St. Theoleptos of Philadelphia, an influence on Gregory of Palamas. In this English rendition, with commentary notes, three of the discourses are arranged to bring soberness into focus. One treats humility of the mind with its associated virtues as a sobering trait in the soul’s movement toward expressing love for God. Spiritual reasoning is a component in perfecting humility by which the soul pushes forward to the Good. The second discourse in the arrangement is on falling away from the Good, safeguarding against the tyranny of passions that incur indebtedness to the devil. The third discourse is on the harm that can be done to a relationship and to one’s soul by thought, speech, and deeds. The discourse illustrates the harm through a quarrel between two sisters, degenerating from anger to hatred, to self-deceit, to spiritual illnesses, and hence an unhealthy disposition that is to be avoided in Christian living as the soul journeys forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".