TRABALHO, EDUCAÇÃO E JUVENTUDES: DIÁLOGO COM O PENSAMENTO SOCIAL DE CHRISTIAN LAVAL E PIERRE DARDOT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo O presente estudo teórico propõe um dia-gnóstico crítico das relações entre trabalho, educação e juventudes contemporâneas, por meio de um breve diálogo com o pensamento social de Christian Laval e Pierre Dardot. Sua preocupação central encontra-se na emergência de novos arranjos subjetivos no contexto do neoliberalismo. Para pensar tais relações foram considerados três traços conceituais derivados das obras dos autores selecionados: a compreensão da crise como modo de vida permanente, a ênfase nos aspectos emocionais e no dispositivo desempenho/gozo e a reinscrição da formação juvenil no território do comum. Ao longo do estudo, evidencia-se que um referencial analítico crítico e heterodoxo, sustentado numa releitura específica do pensamento de Marx articulada a outras contribuições, da forma como tratado por Dardot e Laval, apresenta potencialidade heurística significativa para pensar os conceitos de trabalho, educação e juventude no contexto brasileiro atual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".