MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960637951 · doi:10.5539/apr.v16n1p48

Tensor Satisfying Binary Law for the Equation Including the Trigonometric Function

2024· article· en· W2960637951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinary numberFunction (biology)MathematicsTensor (intrinsic definition)LawMathematical analysisPure mathematicsPolitical scienceArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I already reported that A;ν;σ;λμ=∂3Aμ∂xν∂xσ∂xλ+⋯ must be expressed in A;ν;ν;νμ=∂3Aμ∂xν∂xν∂xν=A if A;ν;σ;λμ=∂3Aμ∂xν∂xσ∂xλ+⋯ was tensor satisfying Binary Law. I reported that Aμ=Sinxν was established from the search result of the property of this ∂3Aμ∂xν∂xν∂xν=A. A trigonometric function is included in Aμ=Sinxν here, but the search about the equation of Tensor satisfying Binary Law including the trigonometric function isn't done. I report the search result about the equation of Tensor satisfying Binary Law including the trigonometric function in this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.481
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.008 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it