MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2960741166

Effects of canopy cover and pH on polyketide synthase gene transcription in Cladonia stygia and the polyketides produced in natural conditions.

2018· article· en· W2960741166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kamaldeep Chhoker

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyketide synthaseCladoniaPolyketideTranscription (linguistics)BiologyGeneGeneticsChemistryBotanyLichenBiosynthesis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyketide synthase (PKS) genes encode large multidomain enzymes that synthesize polyketides (secondary metabolites) but little is known about their biosynthesis. The goals of this study were to identify PKS genes in the Cladonia rangiferina genome in order to target PKS genes in Cladonia stygia, and to compare PKS gene transcription and polyketide production in Cladonia stygia collected from two geologically different locations in Manitoba. The Antibiotic and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell (antiSMASH) program identified 41 secondary metabolite gene clusters consisting of 15 Type 1 PKS genes but only two Non-Reducing Type 1 PKS clusters. The significant difference in the concentration of the polyketides, atranorin and fumarprotocetraric acid, between the two locations corresponded with gene expression using the 21 Beta-Ketoacyl Synthase (p=0.040) and 26 Thioesterase domain (p=0.081), suggesting that these PKS domains may play a role in the production of fumarprotocetraric acid and atranorin, respectively, in the C. stygia thallus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→