MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960781765 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b00757

Novel Technology for the Removal of Brilliant Green from Water: Influence of Post-Oxidation, Environmental Conditions, and Capping

2019· article· en· W2960781765 on OpenAlexafffund
Mainak Ganguly, Parisa A. Ariya

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesEnvironment CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionTap waterChemical engineeringEnvironmental chemistryChemistryMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Chemical dyes are used in a wide range of anthropogenic activities and are generally not biodegradable. Hence, sustainable recycling processes are needed to avoid their accumulation in the environment. A one-step synthesis of Fe core –maghemite shell (Fe–MM) for facile, instantaneous, cost-effective, sustainable, and efficient removal of brilliant green (BG) dye from water has been reported here. The homogenous and monolayer type of adsorption is, to our knowledge, the most efficient, with a maximum uptake capacity of 1000 mg·g –1, for BG on Fe–MM. This adsorbent was shown to be efficient in occurring in time-scales of seconds and to be readily recyclable (ca. 91%). As iron/iron oxide possesses magnetic behavior, a strong magnet could be used to separate Fe–MM coated with BG. Thus, the recycling process required a minimum amount of energy. Capping Fe–MM by hydrophilic clay minerals further enhanced the BG uptake capacity, by reducing unwanted aggregation. Interestingly, capping the adsorbent by hydrophobic plastic (low-density polyethylene) had a completely inverse effect on clay minerals. BG removal using this method is found to be quite selective among the five common industrial dyes tested in this study. To shed light on the life cycle analysis of the composite in the environment, the influence of selected physicochemical factors ( T, pH, h ν, O 3, and NO 2 ) was examined, along with four types of water samples (melted snow, rain, river, and tap water). To evaluate the potential limitations of this technique, because of likely competitive reactions with metal ion contaminants in aquatic systems, additional experiments with 13 metal ions were performed. To decipher the adsorption mechanism, we deployed four reducing agents (NaBH 4, hydrazine, LiAlH 4, and polyphenols in green tea) and NaBH 4, exclusively, favored the generation of an efficient adsorbent via aerial oxidation. The drift of electron density from electron-rich Fe core to maghemite shells was attributed to be responsible for the electrostatic adsorption of N + in BG toward Fe–MM. This technology is deemed to be environmentally sustainable in environmental remediation, namely, in waste management protocol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207