Placement of a temporary cholecystostomy tube to relieve pancreatic EHBDO in a dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 12‐year‐old male neutered labrador retriever was treated for extrahepatic bile duct obstruction (EHBDO) secondary to acute pancreatitis. Supportive care was provided for 14 days, but despite treatment the dog’s clinical condition worsened. A temporary cholecystostomy tube was placed via minilaparotomy to provide extracorporeal diversion of bile until patency of the common bile duct was spontaneously re‐established. Within 24 hours of tube placement, marked improvement in total bilirubin was noted and the dog could be managed as an outpatient. Clinical signs resolved rapidly, and despite complications with the external tubing necessitating replacement after 48 hours the procedure and tube were well tolerated. Patency of the common bile duct was spontaneously re‐established three weeks after tube placement, and the cholecystostomy tube was removed percutaneously. No recurrence of EHBDO was noted in the 13 months following removal of the cholecystostomy tube.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".