End-To-End Vertebra Localization and Level Detection in Weakly Labelled 3D Spinal Mr using Cascaded Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Localization and identification of vertebrae in 3D MR volumes is a crucial first step for diagnosis and management of spinal conditions. Automating this process can save radiologists significant time and clicks. In this paper, we propose a novel learning-based approach consisting of two cascaded networks that perform simultaneous identification and localization of vertebrae. The first network performs slice-based level detection of full 3D sagittal volumes using an adaptive loss function that adjusts the weights of its loss terms during training, and outputs estimated center slices of each vertebrae. The sagittal slice is then divided into sub-volumes each containing a single vertebra. These sub-volumes are inputted into the second network for binary classification and localization of the vertebrae. Our method only requires centroid annotation (performed manually), a statistical model then provides an approximation of the volumetric segmentation for ground truth data. With this method, a vertebra identification rate of 82% was achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".