PROTOCOL: Interventions to reduce distress in adult victims of sexual violence and rape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of rape and other forms of sexual assault vary depending on how terms are defined, what types of sexual assaults are included, the time frame during which the data are collected, sampling methods used, age and gender of the population studied, and the location of the sample (Acierno, Resnick & Kilpatrick, 1997). Further, as few countries have undertaken studies that comprehensively document the prevalence of rape and sexual assault, worldwide incidence is difficult to determine (British Council, 2006). In the United Kingdom, Painter (1991), reported that 1 in 4 women experienced rape or attempted rape. A national random sample of 6,926 women in Sweden found that 1 in 6, or 16% of the respondents, had experienced sexual violence by a former husband or cohabitant and that 1 in 4, or 25% of the respondents, had been subject to sexual violence by a man outside a relationship (Lundgren, Heimer, Westerstrand & Kalliokoski, 2002). In a similar study in Ghana, Coker-Appiah and Cusack (1999) randomly sampled 2,069 women and adolescent girls and found that 1 in 3, or 33% of the respondents, had been touched against their will and that 1 in 5, or 21% of the respondents, had been raped. In the United States, a population-based study of 1,769 women in Virginia discovered that the lifetime prevalence of sexual assault was 27.6% and the prevalence of rape was 17.8%. In a survey of households in Los Angeles, the lifetime prevalence of sexual assault was 13.2% (16.7% for women and 9.4% for men; Burnham et al., 1988). A similar study in Northeastern United States, reported a lifetime prevalence of sexual assault of 7.3% for women and 1.3% for men (Norris, 1992). A national random sample of women found that 12.7% reported a history of rape and 14.3% reported other forms of sexual assault (Resnick et al., 1993). Other US studies have focused on college populations. Koss, Gidcyz and Widniewski (1987) found in their survey of 6,000 students from 32 colleges, that 50% of the respondents indicated having experienced some form of sexual violence after age 14 and 27.5% reported having been raped (Koss, Gidycz & Wisniewski, 1987). In a subsequent study with 2,700 college women, 15% reported rape and 12% reported attempted rape since age 14 (Koss & Dinero, 1989). Gross and colleagues (2006) reported that 27% of a sample of college women had experienced some form of unwanted sexual contact (ranging from kissing and petting to intercourse) since entering college. Thus, while estimates vary, sexual assault affects a non-trivial percentage of the population. Distress often occurs after a person has been exposed to a traumatic event such as sexual assault. Resick (1983) for example found that victims of rape exhibited more depressive symptoms, more fear and anxiety, more problems with social and work adjustment, and more problems with sexual functioning than did a control group of non-victims. The increased prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in victims of rape is well documented. PTSD has been reported to affect between 9 and 15 percent of the general population and almost 50 percent of individuals who have been raped (Treadwell & Foa, 2004). As the negative effects of sexual assault have become better recognized, there is increasing attention to the possibility that psychosocial interventions may reduce suffering and limit distress. There are now several treatments modalities available for victims of rape and sexual assault including: pharmacology; behavioural techniques such as flooding, systematic desensitization, eye movement desensitization and retraining (EMDR); cognitive behavioural therapy; cognitive therapy; relaxation; rational-emotive therapy; group therapy; hypnosis; family/couple therapy; existential therapy; humanistic approaches; and psychodynamic therapy. A critical review of this literature reveals many articles based on clinical impressions, but few studies measuring outcomes of treatment. Due to the well documented negative consequences of sexual assault such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and secondary depression (Resnick, Acierno, Holmes, Kilpatrick, & Jager, 2006), it is imperative that effective and efficient treatment options for these victims are identified (Rothbaum, Astin & Mosteller, 2005). One of the issues in evaluating post-traumatic stress interventions is the degree to which symptoms spontaneously remit. For instance, Rothbaum, Foa, Riggs, Murdock and Walsh (1992) reported that, while 94% of the 95 rape victims in their study met the criteria for PTSD at one week post-rape, this reduced to 47% at 94 days post-rape. Once the three month marker occurs, it has been suggested that symptoms of PTSD become relatively persistent. While there are hundreds of original reports describing the effectiveness of treatments for individuals who have been exposed to traumatic events, the vast majority are not empirically based studies (Solomon & Johnson, 2002). Yet, the natural diminishing of symptoms of PTSD requires that controlled studies be considered when discussing efficacy. Stein, Ipser and Seedat's (2006) systematic review of pharmacotherapy for PTSD is the only systematic review to examine the reduction of distress for victims of rape. The reviewers concluded that while medication treatments can be effective in treating PTSD, there continues to be a need for more effective strategies. However, in this review victims of sexual violence were grouped with other populations of trauma sufferers, and no specific data synthesis was reported regarding those who had been victims of rape. Within the psychotherapy literature, there have been several non-systematic reviews of treatment for rape and sexual assault (Falsetti, 1997; Foa, Rothbaum & Steketee, 1993; Foa & Rothbaum, 1998). Other reviews have examined the reduction of distress in populations experiencing symptomology of PTSD but these reviews were not specific to adult victims of rape and sexual assault. Bisson and Andrew (2007), for example, completed a Cochrane Review of psychological treatments to reduce symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although they found evidence that individual Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy/exposure therapy (TFCBT), eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), stress management and group TFCBT were effective in the treatment of PTSD, the authors made no restriction on the basis of severity of PTSD symptoms or type of traumatic event. Instead, their study population included war veterans, female assault (mainly sexual assault) survivors, refugees and police officers, and mixed groups of individuals who had experienced a variety of traumatic events including road traffic accidents, assaults, bereavement and industrial accidents. Likewise, Sherman (1998) completed a meta-analysis of controlled and clinical trials of psychotherapeutic treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and included samples of combat veterans from the Vietnam and Lebanon Wars, crime-related victims, and severe bereavement sufferers and victims of rape. Sherman examined cognitive, and psychodynamic treatments, in group and individual settings and found the overall impact of psychotherapy on PTSD and psychiatric symptomatology was significant (d = .52, r = .25) with a non-zero, 95% confidence interval suggesting that the true effect lies between .39 and .68, however no data were available specifically for those who were victims of rape. It is important to evaluate treatments specifically for victims rape because although there may appear to be similarity of response to different trauma including rape, accidents and disasters (Rothbaum, Ninan & Thomas, 1996), there is evidence that trauma associated with rape may be different than other forms of trauma in part due to the strong element of self-blame, the higher incidence of concurrent depression and the increased risk of suicide (Connor, Jonathan & Davidson, 1997; Kimerling, Ouimette & Wolfe, 2002). Using a representative sample to assess the differential risks of PTSD across types of trauma exposure, Breslau, Davis, Andreski and Peterson (1991) reported that the incidence of PTSD was highest after rape (49%, SE=12.2) followed by other forms of sexual assault (23%, SE=10.8). The incidence of PTSD after being shot or stabbed was 15% (SE=13.7), a serious car accident was 2.3% (SE=1.3), other kinds of serious accidents was 16.8% (SE=6.2) and following natural disaster was 3.8(SE= 3.0). Given the high risk of PTSD following rape and other forms of sexual assault, there have been a growing number of treatment programs that specifically target victims of rape and other forms of sexual assault. While treatment modalities may not be explicitly feminist, due to the gendered nature of a majority of sexual assault their implementation is often influenced by feminist frameworks and feminist theory. Feminist frameworks pay heed to re-establishing appropriate boundaries in relationships, beginning with the therapeutic relationship, promoting self-determination in the victimized person, and empowerment of the victim to move from victim to survivor. Feminist informed approaches view sexual victimization as a crime against the self and highlight the contributions of a society that condones violence (Bass & Davies, 1992; Myers Avis, 1992; Solomon, 1992). Feminist therapeutic approaches emphasize integrating the social causes of rape into the client's world-view and reducing self-blame and guilt following sexual assault (Enns, 1993; Koss & Harvey, 1991). The goal of such analysis is to help the victim understand that such violence is a societal not individual (Enns, 1993). Although of feminist may different of treatment there is a of in a treatment in this systematic review as a and The of of therapy to victims in from sexual assault and rape are based on the psychodynamic and the cognitive to the psychodynamic traumatic events into and to and the the of self that is and in to and a to and requires of a of self and with 1997; & approaches are the for with trauma in forms sexual assault and rape. is the in which there is the available the literature on & studies 1997; & and clinical & 2006). of on how traumatic events and of and the this occurs, become and the individual is to and the and on of and & 1993; & of treatment a of specific approaches including or Stress and and are based on the that cognitive a significant in the severity and outcomes of PTSD symptoms after sexual assault & 1997; Foa, & Rothbaum, Koss & & Foa, 2002). on the of and cognitive associated with the traumatic which will to and In general these approaches systematic to traumatic and cognitive of these events Riggs, & and and therapy including rape and and reduction techniques & Foa & Rothbaum, & Johnson, 1998). treatments for victims of rape and sexual assault, have been with other types of such as psychodynamic or has been found to be effective in reducing symptoms of PTSD Rothbaum, Riggs, & and Harvey, and Resick 1992; Rothbaum and Foa, has focused on which of treatment be more effective than Foa and colleagues (1991), for instance, and treatment found that while was the effective treatment in reducing PTSD symptomatology after was found to be effective treatment at was to or a in terms of other of anxiety, or It that such approaches treatment by to stress and while the and et al., 1991). However, the evidence to this has been For instance, Foa et (1999) and a of and with a and found that three reduced symptoms of PTSD and depression to the control to general better than or the for PTSD and depression were similar for the three groups across a effect for the reduction in PTSD severity and depression were reported for the treatment. The was in the number and of that in this than the group and the group et al., The authors that this a as to the did not the therapy of cognitive therapy and in the form of and the traumatic event et al., 1993; Resick & 1992). Resick et (1992) that that of the events, and and be more effective in symptoms than the but not regarding which are rape victims & 1992). the of the authors examined in a group in the treatment of PTSD & 1992). The indicated that was effective in symptoms in a majority of in to the in significant in PTSD and depressive symptomatology to the when in a group Resick et a controlled with and a attention victims of rape with to symptoms of PTSD and The authors made not to cognitive in the or to or behavioural in the et 2002). The indicated that and were in treating PTSD in this sample of rape victims to the were found to be effective in treating depressive was found to be to in guilt desensitization and reprocessing has attention the have been mixed and have been a of groups to assess & & et al., et al., studies have been with sample and few studies have been with the victims of sexual assault. Although several that the has not been well (Rothbaum, Astin & similar to (Rothbaum, 1997). For instance, during the is to of traumatic while on a such as or (Rothbaum, 2005). As it has been suggested that PTSD is due to to the trauma and may be in this reprocessing Steketee, & Rothbaum, Rothbaum, 2005). Rothbaum et reported that and had to and significant in rape victims with symptomatology following treatment and at to the control Due to the in this on were and influenced In some have evidence that therapy in with stress or cognitive therapy the & Foa, have evidence that not other cognitive methods and they are effective & et al., It is important to that methods to have higher and as indicated those who have been found to have higher of trauma may be due to the that in trauma reduction occurs the of the fear and that is with the fear in form a & 1993; Rothbaum, Resick & It is that those with higher of symptoms are to the treatment and a treatment methods are more in the criteria for and it is suggested that this of treatment be only when a therapeutic has been and a has been completed & 1991). in this type of treatment are as having the to high have no no no et al., Thus, they are methods may a risk of a these the to review outcomes of distress post interventions for rape and sexual assault and they highlight the specific of evaluating the impact of and on these In there are few treatment options for individuals that have been and no as to which is in PTSD symptoms and post-traumatic It is important to that the has been with women in the it is how these therapeutic approaches work for individuals from other it is not how these treatment options to the of victims of social sexual psychological functioning and of It is not as well at this time the by type of sexual assault assaults, assaults those that during other traumatic events such as Thus, the therapeutic approaches to may not be as effective for types of adult sexual assault is to understand which forms of treatment are and for of this review Although the literature there may be effective treatments for trauma and PTSD in there a in the evidence to the effectiveness of modalities to rape and other forms of sexual assault. the of interventions to reduce distress post rape sexual assault, this review will to a that for the treatment of distress. review will and of psychological programs to reduce distress in adult victims of sexual assault. will be for the review they random to treatment and or control groups or in which groups were at the in and will be The studies will vary in the of groups and will vary in their of to reduce the of studies in a group will be included in the studies will be included of will be and will be of age and who have been victims of sexual assault as and are assault is to attempted with of and other types of or in which unwanted sexual contact is attempted or occurs between the victim and to or attempted sexual with a or by interventions are psychological or psychosocial in nature and will be with and as Although to more controlled trials of cognitive behavioural a will be to controlled of effects of interventions to sexual assault interventions will behavioural techniques such as flooding, systematic desensitization, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR); cognitive behavioural therapy; cognitive therapy; relaxation; rational-emotive therapy; group therapy; hypnosis; family/couple therapy; existential therapy; humanistic approaches; and psychodynamic therapy. will of interventions to in the of this the of this review is to psychosocial interventions to reduce interventions that are based on will be that psychosocial treatments to treatment and studies that psychosocial treatments with treatments will be The is a in trauma symptoms (PTSD). outcomes of anxiety, and and in functioning social of In of outcomes will negative affect of treatment distress following The will be in terms of the of severity of traumatic stress symptoms a such as the PTSD and severity of traumatic stress symptoms a such as the of will severity of depressive symptoms such as the severity of symptoms such as the and work will be considered for the A will be for this have the to review help from the in the to other or or or or or or or unwanted or or or or or or or or or or unwanted or or or or raped or or or raped or or or or 1 or or or or 1 or or or or or or psychosocial or or or or or psychosocial or or or general or social or or or group or individual or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or general or social or or or group or individual or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or or The will for of the because will be the will be and and into the review to In to and other the following will be for will the of articles that are including those from articles that are identified will be and for in the at on and of for from and will be to the review to A of the criteria for the with a sample of will be to these with the for The of to be contact will of and authors of reviews of literature such as Foa, Rothbaum, and Resick to the sexual assault rape sexual violence will be by who will be to to studies not found by will of of and and of and of attention will be made to and studies in the the review will the following to and will be to this literature, such as and and of studies by the will be by reviewers to determine their for in the this will Review which is to and the of systematic which is being by several in and the United States, of management of the of and data and has the of being of the review has a and to the reviewers to the on the the between and The of the studies will be by a The will be in of increasing of the studies based on the and criteria of the and management The of a data form to data from the articles that have made it the The study will be a data by reviewers between will be identified and to and management of the data and to will be by to the of the and will be by a based on the original will from the original reviewers will study to The of the of study will be based on criteria in the Cochrane and will on the of degree of to of and of the data data The of will be completed the following studies may have included more than one of the distress trauma symptoms, post traumatic stress to of study of distress will be In when different and are to of distress such as PTSD, the of and will be the possibility of the effect as a effect a study will only be included only effect are reported by effect are available across different study a outcomes for or samples treatments against one control will be will randomly only one effect for in the For studies that these will be into effects more than and will for available reports and data will be in this will be to reports and the will be for reports will be with and In data and are will contact the of the studies and to on will be as synthesis will be and with For effect will be as with 95% confidence data will be into and with 95% confidence will suggested by and to and into will be to for sample there are and of the outcomes or across will by and colleagues to to will the data to there is no evidence of in the will there is evidence of or studies only or analysis of will from the methods group on options for these effect The random effects will be for that there will be of across of the effect studies estimates of a population effect are for and will be and reported As for outcomes will be reported a study reports of the of or more of the will be for group across will be for group across will be and between groups will be of will be reported in a but will be reported in the As indicated in this types of treatment that will be are psychodynamic and cognitive behavioural The literature on the of psychodynamic and psychotherapy for the treatment of sexual assault and rape is relatively and a review of the of treatment these approaches will be in the approaches to treatment and sexual assault have been more There is some evidence that a between those approaches that and those that those which have criteria and higher when to those Thus, will be on this of the effects of the different types of will be with a number of studies or a study reports more than one as part of the it will be as the In the of types will be For example, will at with the following types of will of effects and effects of effects studies that or of effects studies that different will be across these types of in the will be the and the associated for analysis and the 2002). The will determine the percentage of that is due to a than 50% the and clinical studies will be in terms of associated with overall study and types of of and different of a will examine effects of interventions with different types of of analysis will be the reported in studies or will be to examine the impact of the following as on the effectiveness of the victim sexual history of and victim analysis will be to assess the of to of data and approaches to analysis will be by studies with high differential of of for and sample will be with of and and methods that treatment effect by for the number and outcomes of studies & will not be included in this systematic of for studies of criteria of study and data of data from reports of and will be for this that this review will be as evidence at to and for their on this to for Although the authors of the review have to on the they have no in the treatments that are the subject of this review or in the of the The authors not have to in a of Other of and were to this the study document of the of of different included in the the group in different = = In what or social is the treatment the of treatment type in of of the treatment type 1 = on the implementation of the treatment type 1 = for implementation of the treatment 1 = for the implementation of the treatment 1 = the for the group other than no treatment or treatment as to the is the of control in to for group = of random to not random of subject appropriate of distress of group similarity = or with strong evidence of 1 group to be different or different that are to distress. in the study of to from & will be in one of three risk of criteria risk of criteria and high risk of than criteria of and treatment group of the included in the study in terms of of for number of individuals at beginning of the of analysis to determine sample of to of of and regarding and of or of data other this a and of = effect a study data are found type frame in by group sample for this effect group sample for this effect group group the group group from or of from a analysis of with one in the for a from or of from a analysis of with one in the with = 1 by of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".