MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961197250 · doi:10.18280/i2m.180201

Numerical Study of a Longitudinal Solar Dryer in Semi-Arid Area; Case Study

2019· article· fr· W2961197250 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofiane Kherrour, Amor Bouhdjar, Salah Hanini, Abdelhamid Boualit, Djemoui Lalmi

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAridSolar dryerEnvironmental scienceSolar energyGeologyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical simulation to predict the thermal performance of a longitudinal solar dryer has been carried out.For this, a mathematical model, based on the finite element method, has been developed to evaluate the thermal behavior of the solar dryer using a control system.The main objective of the used control system is to maintain the drying temperature inside a suitable range for the product to dry, under varying weather conditions, over the time drying process.This is achieved through many different steps.As, an example, at the beginning of drying process when solar radiation is low, the air flow rate at the inlet varies between Re=25 and Re=85.In other hand, when solar radiation is higher, fresh air is injected.The outcomes of simulation work showed that the obtained results are generally satisfactory.Nonetheless, this model can be further refined to obtain better results, as a more stable gradient temperature, over the full drying period.Moreover, it is worthy mentioned that thermal storage system can be combined with the studied solar drier, in the way to compensate the heat insufficiency, during low solar radiation days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207