MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961341312 · doi:10.1128/mbio.01319-19

Ubiquinone Biosynthesis over the Entire O <sub>2</sub> Range: Characterization of a Conserved O <sub>2</sub> -Independent Pathway

2019· article· en· W2961341312 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ludovic Pélosi, Chau-Duy-Tam Vo, Sophie S. Abby, Laurent Loiseau, Bérengère Rascalou, Mahmoud Hajj Chehade, Bruno Faivre, Mathieu Goussé, Clothilde Chenal, Nadia Touati, Laurent Binet, David Cornu, Cameron D. Fyfe, Marc Fontecave, Frédéric Barras, Murielle Lombard, Fabien Pierrel

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsBiosynthesisComputational biologyBiologyChemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to colonize environments with large O 2 gradients or fluctuating O 2 levels, bacteria have developed metabolic responses that remain incompletely understood. Such adaptations have been recently linked to antibiotic resistance, virulence, and the capacity to develop in complex ecosystems like the microbiota. Here, we identify a novel pathway for the biosynthesis of ubiquinone, a molecule with a key role in cellular bioenergetics. We link three uncharacterized genes of Escherichia coli to this pathway and show that the pathway functions independently from O 2 . In contrast, the long-described pathway for ubiquinone biosynthesis requires O 2 as a substrate. In fact, we find that many proteobacteria are equipped with the O 2 -dependent and O 2 -independent pathways, supporting that they are able to synthesize ubiquinone over the entire O 2 range. Overall, we propose that the novel O 2 -independent pathway is part of the metabolic plasticity developed by proteobacteria to face various environmental O 2 levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207