MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961416033

CANO/ACIO International Symposium: Working in partnership within and beyond our Canadian borders to enhance oncology care.

2019· article· en· W2961416033 on OpenAlexaffabout
Linda Watson, Margaret I. Fitch, Tayreez Mushani, Pamela Savage, Fay J. Strohschein, Martine Puts, Cindy Kenis, Lorelei Newton, Maurene McQuestion

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCanadian Association of Nurses in OncologyAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipCancerHealth careHealthcare systemMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceEconomic growthInternal medicineLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, cancer is increasingly affecting our societies, families and healthcare systems. It is estimated more than 14 million people are diagnosed annually, greater than 8 million people die of cancer each year, and there are more than 32 million people living with and beyond cancer around the world. Complicating these overwhelming statistics is the reality that many countries in the world do not have well developed cancer treatment programs; nor is it consistently recognized that specialized knowledge about cancer and caring for those with cancer is required by nurses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207