The legacy of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in the formation of North American Deco
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cities as far afield as Brussels, Tunis, Montreal, Rio de Janeiro, and Shanghai, the diaspora of architects classically trained at the Paris Ecole des Beaux-Arts orchestrated, popularized, and interpreted Art Deco with elegance and panache. This chapter presents a larger study of the combined design acumen and social leverage of the “Beaux-Arts architect” in the US and Canada. It reviews Beaux-Arts tenets and strategies applicable to Deco work by focusing on spaces of consumption and leisure, comprehended as transatlantic typologies; their Parisian frame of reference is manifest, and their design was dictated by branding and visual agenda. Steadily produced since the 1980s, publications on Ecole-trained architects in North America still amount to the tip of the Beaux-Arts iceberg. In 1924, Jacques Carlu was hired as MIT’s chief design critic on the strength of his 1919 Grand Prix de Rome, but also for his charisma, youthful enthusiasm, and possibly his athletic stature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it