MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961668287 · doi:10.5382/rev.19.05

The Larder Lake-Cadillac Break and Its Gold Districts

2017· book-chapter· en· W2961668287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K H Poulsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Larder Lake-Cadillac Break is a gold metallotect, which extends for more than 250 km from Matachewan in Ontario to Val-d’Or in Quebec. For much of its length it juxtaposes older komatiitic rocks against younger sedimentary units. Among the adjacent sedimentary rocks are distinctive intervals of polymict conglomerate and crossbedded sandstone, which make up part of the Timiskaming Group that unconformably overlies previously folded volcanic strata. Rocks in the vicinity of the break are commonly strongly carbonatized, with the type and abundance of carbonate minerals being controlled largely by protolith composition. Shoshonitic to alkalic igneous rocks occur along the break as volcanic units within the Timiskaming, as plutonic rocks in syn-Timiskaming stocks and plugs, and as local arrays of albitite dikes of intermediate composition. High-strain dislocative deformation is variably developed along the break but its intensity is in part a reflection of metasomatic phyllosilicates in the affected rocks. Gold deposits tend to form clusters along the break and their relationship to it is two-fold: a subset of geologically similar deposits are localized in direct proximity to the break but the majority of gold in the region is found in diverse settings away from it with no clear genetic connection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207