MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961759084 · doi:10.4337/9781788972284.00026

The imitation game? The partnership between ASEAN and Canada in search of strategic relevance

2019· book-chapter· en· W2961759084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bartosz Płotka

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipBilateralismDisarmamentPoliticsPolitical scienceDimension (graph theory)Relevance (law)PillarPolitical economyImitationInternational tradeMultilateralismEconomicsLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada and ASEAN are political actors that avoid open conflicts and recourse to hard-power means. They pursue economic growth, regional military disarmament and peace. Despite these profoundly common strategic goals and diplomatic declarations on strengthening their bilateral cooperation, the relations between Canada and ASEAN seem to remain modest and circumspect, regardless of the fact that the cooperation has lasted since 1977 and that they established the enhanced partnership in 2009. Surprisingly, after nearly forty years of diplomatic interaction, the main cooperation pillar of this partnership has remained the socio-cultural and not the economic one, which was widely expected to fit the profile of the ASEAN–Canadian bilateralism. Despite advantageous preconditions, both actors eschew substantial economic exchange and high politics. This chapter presents the factors which account for such a constellation and explores the possibilities of deepening the partnership by emphasizing the so far largely missing strategic dimension of the ASEAN–Canadian partnership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooksSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207