Origin of dynamical instabilities in some simulated two-dimensional materials: GaSe as a case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the emergence of two-dimensional (2D) materials, a large amount of work has been dedicated to this class of materials. Numerical simulations have proven to be powerful to analyze and predict structure-properties relationships. However, a recurrent issue that arises in some 2D compounds is the appearance of a dynamical instability as an unstable phonon branch in a small pocket close to the Brillouin zone center. The origin (numerical and/or physical) of this instability is hardly discussed. Here, using a rising 2D material, GaSe, as a case study, this issue is tackled by discussing the numerical techniques that may be used to lift the instability but also by understanding the fundamental origin of it. The interlayer distance is the crucial parameter and the ionicity of the compounds is the key physical property governing the propensity for instability. In many works, this distance is arbitrarily fixed to a value for which the absence of interactions between the periodic images of the layers is assumed. A careful control of the effect of this distance on the stability is required prior to subsequent calculations of physical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".