MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2961858650 · doi:10.1101/696666

Non-rainfall moisture: a key driver of carbon flux from standing litter in arid, semiarid, and mesic grasslands

2019· preprint· en· W2961858650 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Evans, Katherine EO Todd-Brown, Kathryn M. Jacobson, Peter J. Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrasslandEnvironmental scienceAridDewMoistureLitterHumidityAtmospheric sciencesHydrology (agriculture)PrecipitationWater contentEcologyGeographyGeologyMeteorologyCondensation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Models assume that rainfall is the major source of moisture driving decomposition. Non-rainfall moisture (NRM: high humidity, dew, and fog) can also induce standing litter decomposition, but there have been few standard measurements of NRM-mediated decompositions across sites, and no efforts to extrapolate the contribution of NRM to larger scales to assess whether this mechanism can improve model predictions. Here we show that NRM is an important, year-round source of moisture in grassland sites with contrasting moisture regimes using field measurements and modeling. We first characterized NRM frequency and measured NRM-mediated decomposition in sites on the extreme dry and wet end of grassland systems: at two sites in the Namib Desert, Namibia (hyperarid desert) and at one site in Iowa, USA (tallgrass prairie). NRM was frequent at all sites (85-99% of hours that litter was likely to be wet were attributed to NRM) and tended to occur in cool, high-humidity periods for several hours or more at a time. NRM also caused respiration of standing litter at all sites when litter became sufficiently wet (>5% for fine litter and >13% for coarse), and contributed to mass loss, even in the Namib West site that had almost no rain. When we modeled annual mass loss induced by NRM and rain, and extrapolated our characterization of NRM decomposition to a final site with intermediate rainfall (Sevilleta, New Mexico, semiarid grassland), we found that models driven by rainfall alone underestimated mass loss, while including NRM produced estimates within the range of observed mass loss. Together these findings suggest that NRM is an important missing component in quantitative and conceptual models of litter decomposition, but there is nuance involved in modeling NRM at larger scales. Specifically, temperature and physical features of the substrate emerge as factors that affect the common microbial response to litter wetting under NRM across grasslands sites, and require further study. Hourly humidity can provide an adequate proxy of NRM frequency, but site-specific calibration with litter wetness is needed to accurately attribute decomposition to periods when NRM wets litter. Greater recognition of NRM-driven decomposition and its interaction with other processes (e.g. photodegradation) is needed, especially since fog, dew, and humidity are likely to shift under future climates. Manuscript highlights Non-rainfall moisture (NRM; humidity, fog, dew) induces decomposition in grasslands NRM decomposition depends on substrate type, and occurs at colder times than rain Including NRM (instead of rain alone) improved predictions of litter decomposition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→