Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'imagination permet-elle de figurer la mort? Nous faut-il utiliser deux langages, plutot qu'un, pour la representer? Et comment s'influencent la peinture et l'ecriture dans une demarche creatrice visant a saisir l'insaisissable? L'œuvre de Sergio Kokis nous invite a ces reflexions. Dans la genese de l'œuvre kokisienne, La danse macabre du Quebec (1999) precede l'ecriture des romans. Cette œuvre allie la peinture et la poesie selon une tradition occidentale qui remonte au Moyen Âge. Elle represente la mort en la faisant intervenir dans des scenes de la vie quotidienne. Cette figure macabre constitue aussi un motif essentiel du premier roman de Kokis, Le pavillon des miroirs (1994), qui a recu, entre autres, le prix de l'Academie des lettres du Quebec et le prix Quebec-Paris. L'enjeu de notre etude sera de decouvrir comment s'effectue le passage de la peinture vers l'ecriture et de comprendre en quoi l'irruption des images de mort constitue l'inspiration d'œuvres qui deviennent le seul recours possible pour retrouver la vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".