MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962149853 · doi:10.1109/icc.2019.8761643

Achieving Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Top-k Query Over Vertically Distributed Data Sources

2019· article· en· W2962149853 on OpenAlexaff
Yandong Zheng, Rongxing Lu, Xue Yang, Jun Shao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInformation privacyDistributed databaseQuery optimizationInformation retrievalDistributed computingComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data collected from various data sources are destined to be logically interrelated but geographically distributed. Top-k query is an efficient way to find the most important objects from high volumes of data. A common way to process the top-k query over distributed data is to bring them to a centralized entity (e.g. cloud). However, there are privacy considerations during the top-k query when dealing with sensitive data (e.g. eHealthcare data) in such method. Apart from data privacy, efficiency also needs to be taken into consideration. Existing focuses on top-k query do not (fully) consider the data privacy or efficiency. In order to deal with the mentioned disadvantages, in this paper, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving top-k query scheme over vertically distributed data. Specifically, we first design a data filtering technique to reduce the number of transmitted data from each data source to the centralized entity, which can greatly reduce the communication overhead and computational cost. Then, we propose a privacy-preserving top-k query scheme over encrypted data by deploying the homomorphic encryption technique, which can well preserve the private information and achieve the functionality at the same time. Besides, security analysis shows that the proposed scheme is privacy-preserving and performance evaluation validates the efficiency of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207