Workload Scheduling in Vehicular Networks With Edge Cloud Capabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to support the development of 5G technologies, researchers are actively engaged in addressing the challenges accompanying the emerging 5G applications. Unquestionably, an eminent technology gaining significant research attention is edge computing. Vehicular edge computing brings data storage and computing capabilities as well as hosting support applications that comprise emerging vehicular services and applications which demand low-delay processing, to the edge closer to the vehicles, reducing response time and increasing reliability, therefore achieving the holistic vision of the tactile Internet. In this context, this paper considers a vehicular network with edge computing capabilities deployed at road side units, and addresses the problem of workload offloading as well as scheduling of computation tasks on the computing resources available at the edge. The challenge here is the high mobility of the vehicles and hence their short residence time within the coverage range of the road side units hosting the edge computing resources. A joint problem considering the communication and computation resources, as well as the latency requirements of the workload is formulated and the scheduling is shown to be NP-Hard. Subsequently, efficient solutions based on Lagrangian relaxation are derived and presented. We evaluate numerically the proposed methods and show their closeness to the optimal solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".