MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962632334 · doi:10.2196/13865

Understanding Comorbidities and Their Contribution to Predictors of Medical Resource Utilization for an Age- and Sex-Matched Patient Population Living With HIV: Cross-Sectional Study

2019· article· en· W2962632334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Odlum, Sunmoo Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Aging · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthData Science Institute, Columbia University
KeywordsMedicineComorbidityCross-sectional studyMedical recordPopulationDiseaseDemographyInternal medicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: More than 60% of people aging with HIV are observed to have multiple comorbidities, which are attributed to a variety of factors (eg, biological and environmental), with sex differences observed. However, understanding these differences and their contribution to medical resource utilization remains challenging as studies conducted exclusively and predominantly among males do not translate well to females, resulting in inconsistent findings across study cohorts and limiting our knowledge of sex-specific comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to provide further insight into aging-related comorbidities, their associated sex-based differences, and their contribution to medical resource utilization, through the analysis of HIV patient data matched by sex. METHODS: International Classification of Disease 9/10 diagnostic codes that comprise the electronic health records of males (N=229) and females (N=229) were categorized by individual characteristics, chronic and mental health conditions, treatment, high-risk behaviors, and infections and the codes were used as predictors of medical resource utilization represented by Charlson comorbidity scores. RESULTS: Significant contributors to high Charlson scores in males were age (beta=2.37; 95% CI 1.45-3.29), longer hospital stay (beta=.046; 95% CI 0.009-0.083), malnutrition (beta=2.96; 95% CI 1.72-4.20), kidney failure (beta=2.23; 95% CI 0.934-3.52), chemotherapy (beta=3.58; 95% CI 2.16-5.002), history of tobacco use (beta=1.40; 95% CI 0.200-2.61), and hepatitis C (beta=1.49; 95% CI 0.181-2.79). Significant contributors to high Charlson scores in females were age (beta=1.37; 95% CI 0.361-2.38), longer hospital stay (beta=.042; 95% CI 0.005-0.078), heart failure (beta=2.41; 95% CI 0.833-3.98), chemotherapy (beta=3.48; 95% CI 1.626-5.33), and substance abuse beta=1.94; 95% CI 0.180, 3.702). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified sex-based differences in medical resource utilization. These include kidney failure for men and heart failure for women. Increased prevalence of comorbidities in people living long with HIV has the potential to overburden global health systems. The development of narrower HIV phenotypes and aging-related comorbidity phenotypes with greater clinical validity will support intervention efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR AgingSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207