MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962639493 · doi:10.1109/icc.2019.8761823

Energy-Efficient Secure NOMA-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing Networks

2019· article· en· W2962639493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEavesdroppingComputer scienceMobile edge computingComputation offloadingSecrecyNomaBenchmark (surveying)ComputationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingEnergy consumptionComputer networkDistributed computingAlgorithmTelecommunications linkComputer securityTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) system in the presence of a malicious eavesdropper. We employ the partial offloading mode such that each user can divide the individual computation task into two parts for local executing and offloading, respectively. The secrecy outage probability is adopted to measure the secrecy performance of computation ofloading by considering the practically passive eavesdropping scenario. Under this setup, we investigate the problem of minimizing the weighted sum-energy consumption for all users, subject to the secrecy ofloading rates constraints, the computation latency constraints and the secrecy outage probability constraints, and then derive the semi-closed form solution for this problem. Numerical results are provided and demonstrate that the merits of our proposed design are better than those of the alternative benchmark schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it