Graph Splitting: A Graph-Based Approach for Superfamily-Scale Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A protein superfamily contains distantly related proteins that have acquired diverse biological functions through a long evolutionary history. Phylogenetic analysis of the early evolution of protein superfamilies is a key challenge because existing phylogenetic methods show poor performance when protein sequences are too diverged to construct an informative multiple sequence alignment (MSA). Here, we propose the Graph Splitting (GS) method, which rapidly reconstructs a protein superfamily-scale phylogenetic tree using a graph-based approach. Evolutionary simulation showed that the GS method can accurately reconstruct phylogenetic trees and be robust to major problems in phylogenetic estimation, such as biased taxon sampling, heterogeneous evolutionary rates, and long-branch attraction when sequences are substantially diverge. Its application to an empirical data set of the triosephosphate isomerase (TIM)-barrel superfamily suggests rapid evolution of protein-mediated pyrimidine biosynthesis, likely taking place after the RNA world. Furthermore, the GS method can also substantially improve performance of widely used MSA methods by providing accurate guide trees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it