Extern objects in P4: an ROHC compressing scheme case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
P4 is an emergent packet-processing language with which the user can describe how the packets are to be processed in a switching element. This paper presents a way to implement complex operations that are not natively supported in P4. In this work, we explored two different methods to add extensions to P4: i) using new native primitives and ii) using extern instances. As a case study, an ROHC entity was implemented and invoked in a P4 program. The tests showed similar relative performance in both methods in terms of normalized packet latency. However, extern instances appear to be more suitable for target-specific switching applications, where the manufacturer/vendor can specify its own specific operations without changes in the P4 syntax and semantics. Extern instances only require changes in the target-specific backend compiler while keeping the P4 frontend compiler unchanged. The use of externs also results in a more elegant code solution since they are implemented outside the switch-core, thus reducing side effects risks that can be caused by a modification in a switch pipeline implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".