MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962740177 · doi:10.1109/tmm.2019.2891418

MC-SSM: Nonparametric Semantic Image Segmentation With the ICM Algorithm

2019· article· en· W2962740177 on OpenAlexaff
Lazhar Khelifi, Max Mignotte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImage segmentationArtificial intelligenceSegmentationScale-space segmentationPattern recognition (psychology)Nonparametric statisticsAlgorithmComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last few years, there has been considerable interest in scene parsing. This task consists of assigning a predefined class label to each pixel (or pre-segmented region) in an image. To best address the complexity challenge of this task, first, we propose a new geometric retrieval strategy to select nearest neighbors from a database containing fully segmented and annotated images. Then, we introduce a novel and simple energy-minimization model. The proposed cost function of this model combines efficiently different global nonparametric semantic likelihood energy terms. These terms are computed from the (pre-)segmented regions of the (query) image and their structural properties (location, texture, color, context, and shape). Different from the traditional approaches, we use a simple and local optimization procedure derived from the iterative conditional modes algorithm to optimize our energy-based model. Experimental results on two challenging datasets: 1) microsoft research Cambridge dataset and 2) Stanford background dataset demonstrate the feasibility and the success of the proposed approach. Compared to existing annotation methods that require training classifiers for each object and learning many parameters, our method is easy to implement, has a few parameters, and combines different criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MultimediaSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207