MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962748714 · doi:10.1111/cgf.13804

SiamesePointNet: A Siamese Point Network Architecture for Learning 3D Shape Descriptor

2019· article· en· W2962748714 on OpenAlexaff
Mengying Wang, Wendong Mao, Minglun Gong, Xuanqing Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsShape contextArtificial intelligenceTransformation (genetics)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Matching (statistics)Feature (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Shape analysis (program analysis)Benchmark (surveying)Heat kernel signaturePoint (geometry)Geometric transformationMathematicsComputer visionActive shape modelImage (mathematics)GeometrySegmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a novel deep learning approach to extract point‐wise descriptors directly on 3D shapes by introducing Siamese Point Networks, which contain a global shape constraint module and a feature transformation operator. Such geometric descriptor can be used in a variety of shape analysis problems such as 3D shape dense correspondence, key point matching and shape‐to‐scan matching. The descriptor is produced by a hierarchical encoder–decoder architecture that is trained to map geometrically and semantically similar points close to one another in descriptor space. Benefiting from the additional shape contrastive constraint and the hierarchical local operator, the learned descriptor is highly aware of both the global context and local context. In addition, a feature transformation operation is introduced in the end of our networks to transform the point features to a compact descriptor space. The feature transformation can make the descriptors extracted by our networks unaffected by geometric differences in shapes. Finally, an N‐tuple loss is used to train all the point descriptors on a complete 3D shape simultaneously to obtain point‐wise descriptors. The proposed Siamese Point Networks are robust to many types of perturbations such as the Gaussian noise and partial scan. In addition, we demonstrate that our approach improves state‐of‐the‐art results on the BHCP benchmark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207