MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962748714 · doi:10.1111/cgf.13804

SiamesePointNet: A Siamese Point Network Architecture for Learning 3D Shape Descriptor

2019· article· en· W2962748714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsShape contextArtificial intelligenceTransformation (genetics)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Matching (statistics)Feature (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Shape analysis (program analysis)Benchmark (surveying)Heat kernel signaturePoint (geometry)Geometric transformationMathematicsComputer visionActive shape modelImage (mathematics)GeometrySegmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a novel deep learning approach to extract point‐wise descriptors directly on 3D shapes by introducing Siamese Point Networks, which contain a global shape constraint module and a feature transformation operator. Such geometric descriptor can be used in a variety of shape analysis problems such as 3D shape dense correspondence, key point matching and shape‐to‐scan matching. The descriptor is produced by a hierarchical encoder–decoder architecture that is trained to map geometrically and semantically similar points close to one another in descriptor space. Benefiting from the additional shape contrastive constraint and the hierarchical local operator, the learned descriptor is highly aware of both the global context and local context. In addition, a feature transformation operation is introduced in the end of our networks to transform the point features to a compact descriptor space. The feature transformation can make the descriptors extracted by our networks unaffected by geometric differences in shapes. Finally, an N‐tuple loss is used to train all the point descriptors on a complete 3D shape simultaneously to obtain point‐wise descriptors. The proposed Siamese Point Networks are robust to many types of perturbations such as the Gaussian noise and partial scan. In addition, we demonstrate that our approach improves state‐of‐the‐art results on the BHCP benchmark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it