Perception and evaluation of language identity in East Timorese speakers of Portuguese: language and cognition in a multilingual community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study we propose to focus on perception and evaluation of language attitude and identity in the case of the East Timorese speakers of Portuguese, residing both in Timor-Leste (East Timor- ET) and in Portugal (cf. Batoréo 2005 and following, and the Casadinho corpus, in preparation). Given the richness and the complexity of the linguistic situation observed in ET, its present sociolinguistic situation can be seen as a form of poliglossia, where typologically different languages – belonging to Austronesian, Papuan, and Indo-European families – stay in permanent language contact with each other and play roles of different sociolinguistic varieties. It is claimed that the linguistic identity of ET inhabitants is constructed as a function of their history and the political options taken by their recently independent state with a generation gap observed at 40/50. The data are discussed in light of Cognitive Sociolinguistics
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".