MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962826015

On a Class of Solutions of KdV

2015· preprint· en· W2962826015 on OpenAlex
Mikhail Y. Kovalyov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueviXra · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKorteweg–de Vries equationFourier transformMathematicsSuperposition principleOmegaClass (philosophy)Inverse scattering transformNonlinear systemFourier seriesIntegrable systemInversePure mathematicsMathematical analysisMathematical physicsPhysicsInverse problemInverse scattering problemQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practically every book on the Inverse Scattering Transform method for solving the Cauchy problem for KdV and other integrable systems refers to this method as nonlinear Fourier Transform. If it is indeed so, the method should lead to a nonlinear analogue of the Fourier expansion formula $u(t,x)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \hat{u}(k) e^{i\big(kx-\omega(k)t\big)} dk.$ In this paper a special class of solutions of KdV whose role is similar to that of $e^{i\big(kx-\omega(k)t\big)}$ is discussed. Theory of these solutions, referred to here as harmonic breathers, is developed and it is shown that these solutions may be used to construct more general solutions of KdV similarly to how the functions $e^{i\big(kx-\omega(t)\big)} $ are used to perform the same task in the theory of Fourier transform. Nonlinear superposition formula for general solutions of KdV similar to the Fourier expansion formula is conjectured.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it