MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962831904 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2930225

Multimodal Neuroimaging Fusion in Nonsubsampled Shearlet Domain Using Location-Scale Distribution by Maximizing the High Frequency Subband Energy

2019· article· en· W2962831904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShearletComputer scienceNeuroimagingArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)EstimatorMaximum a posteriori estimationGaussianBrain atlasFusionMathematicsStatisticsWaveletMaximum likelihoodPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fusion of medical imaging data obtained from different modalities plays an important role in the current clinical practice. In this paper, we propose a novel multimodal fusion algorithm for brain imaging data based on the statistical properties of nonsubsampled shearlet transform (NSST) coefficients and a novel energy maximization fusion rule. The marginal distributions of the high-frequency NSST coefficients exhibit heavier tails than the Gaussian distribution. As a consequence, after studying its characteristics, we use a heavy-tailed probability density function, student's t location-scale distribution, to describe the highly non-Gaussian statistics of empirical NSST coefficients by learning the parameters using maximum likelihood estimation. Then, we employ this model to develop a maximum a posteriori estimator to obtain the noise-free coefficients. Then, for the first time, a novel fusion rule for obtaining the fused NSST coefficients based on maximizing the energy in the high-frequency subbands is proposed. Experiments are carried out on fusing two or more multimodal neuroimages taken from the BrainWeb, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and Whole Brain Atlas databases. It is seen from the subjective and objective results that the proposed multimodal neuroimaging fusion method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods including under noisy scenarios, and hence, it is more robust. It is also observed that the signal intensities in the fused images are better enhanced when a more number of source images are being fused. The proposed technique should benefit the medical professionals in diagnosing neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it