MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962841010 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v21i3.2080

Review of Recent Legacy Airline Mergers in the U.S.: An Empirical Study from Investors’ Perspectives

2019· article· en· W2962841010 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chin-Wen Huang, Chris C. Hsu, Triant Flouris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMergers and acquisitionsBusinessCopula (linguistics)Financial economicsFinanceEconomicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 2008 financial crisis, three legacy airline mergers have dramatically reshaped the landscape of the U.S. airline industry. Due to the lengthy process involved in an airline merger, it is important to understand whether the investors view the merger favorably. This study examined how investors reacted to the three recent legacy airline mergers in the U.S. by adopting a GARCH-EVT-Copula approach. Our empirical results revealed that positive dependencies between returns and trading volume changes were observed for each merger during various periods, indicating that investors were optimistic about the mergers. Accordingly, implications for future mergers are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207