Motion modeling of a non-holonomic wheeled mobile robot based on trajectory tracking control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trajectory tracking is a problem of emphasis for the mobile robot. In this study, a coordinate transformation method was used to build a kinematic model of the wheeled mobile robot. A traditional proportional-integral-derivative control method was researched and improved by combining it with a neural network. A neural network proportional-integral-derivative trajectory tracking control method was thus designed, and a simulation experiment was performed using Simulink. The results show that in circular trajectory tracking control, the maximum errors of the X axis, Y axis, and θ were approximately 2.1 m, 2.3 m, and 0.4 rad, respectively, and that the system remained stable after running for 10 s. In straight-line trajectory tracking control, the maximum errors of the X axis, Y axis, and θ were approximately −0.8 m, 1.3 m, and 0.3 rad, respectively, and the system remained stable after running for 8 s. The error was relatively small, and the effect of trajectory tracking control was good. The studied method had good performance in terms of wheeled mobile robot trajectory tracking control and is worthy of further promotion and application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".