Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2012, la traduction au Quebec d’ouvrages litteraires d’auteurs issus de l’Amerique hispanique est encore un phenomene marginal. Pourtant, les entreprises de traduction de tels ouvrages se sont faites plus nombreuses au cours des vingt dernieres annees. A partir de la theorie des champs de Pierre Bourdieu et de l’application de cette theorie a l’espace litteraire international par Pascale Casanova, cet ouvrage cherche a expliquer plus en detail les conditions et logiques qui sous-tendent la traduction et l’edition des litteratures hispano-americaines au Quebec. Trois trajectoires d'auteur ont ete analysees: celle d'Horacio Castellanos Moya, celle de Jaime Sabines et celle d'Yvonne America Truque. Chacune illustre un modele de production et de diffusion particulier de la litterature hispano-americaine en traduction au Quebec. Ensemble, elles permettent de degager le parcours evolutif de l’edition vers une integration de plus en plus mondialisee des mecanismes de diffusion des biens symboliques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".