MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962908221 · doi:10.37541/plenojure.v8i2.38

Perkembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia

2019· article· id· W2962908221 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLENO JURE · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak.Perkembangan ekonomi Islam berlangsung dengan begitu pesat. Hal ini juga didukung oleh sektor hukum, yakni dilandasi dengan keluarnya peraturan perundang- undangan di bidang ekonomi syariah, antara lain adalah keluarnya Undang- undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 yang memberikan kewenangan bagi Pengadilan Agama untuk menangani perkara sengketa ekonomi syariah. Selain itu keluarnya Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2008 tentang Surat Berharga Syariah Negara dan Undang-undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah semakin memperkokoh landasan hukum ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Pada tataran praktis, keberadaan lembaga-lembaga keuangan syariah sekarang ini menunjukkan adanya perkembangan yang semakin pesat. Hal ini sejalan dengan semakin meningkatnya kesadaran sebagian besar umat Islam untuk melaksanakan Islam secara kaffah. Adapun tujuan penelitian dari jurnal ini adalah Untuk Mengetahui perkembangaan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, dengan metode penelitian penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual yaitu mencari asas-asas, doktrin-doktrin dan sumber hukum dalam arti filosofis yuridis. Alasan peneliti menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif karena untuk menghasilkan argumentasi, teori atau konsep baru sebagai praktisi dalam menyelesaikan masalah yang dihadapi. Adapun hasil penelitian dan Pembahasan adalah Keberadaan ekonomi syariah di Indoinesia, sesungguhnya sudah mengakar sekalipun keberlakuannya masih bersifat normatif sosiologis.
 Abstract. The development of Islamic economics took place so rapidly. This is also supported by the legal sector, which is based on the issuance of laws and regulations in the field of Islamic economics, among others, the issuance of Law Number 3 of 2006 which gives authority to the Religious Courts to handle sharia economic dispute cases. In addition, the issuance of Law Number 19 of 2008 concerning State Sharia Securities and Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking further strengthens the legal foundation of Islamic economics in Indonesia. At a practical level, the existence of Islamic financial institutions now shows an increasingly rapid development. This is in line with the increasing awareness of the majority of Muslims to implement Islam faithfully. The research objective of this journal is to find out the development of Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia, with normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach that is to seek principles, doctrines and sources of law in a juridical philosophical sense. The reason researchers use normative legal research is to produce new arguments, theories or concepts as practitioners in solving problems they face. The results of the research and discussion are the existence of Islamic economics in Indonesia, in fact it has taken root even though its validity is still normative sociology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it