MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962913615 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2930588

Two-Tier Architecture for Spectrum Auction in SDN-Enabled Cloud Radio Access Network

2019· article· en· W2962913615 on OpenAlexafffund
Ajmery Sultana, Isaac Woungang, Lian Zhao, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkCloud computingRadio access networkSpectrum auctionQuality of serviceAuction theoryBase stationBiddingBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for mobile services is growing aberrantly, which provides both challenges and opportunities for wireless networks. Wireless network virtualization is suggested as a key progression path for enhancing the capacity and resource utilization in the forthcoming fifth-generation mobile networks. In this paper, a software-defined network (SDN) enabled cloud radio access network (C-RAN) framework is proposed for enabling spectrum auction with a two-tier architecture support. In Tier-I, several remote radio heads (RRHs) are introduced to act as the secondary service providers to provide services to its small cell users (SUEs) by exploiting the purchased underutilized or idle resources from the primary service provider in Tier-II. Specifically, in order to maintain quality-of-service requirements of the SUEs, the revenue maximization problem for the RRHs is formulated by considering the user association, band assignment, interference management, and budget allowance. In Tier-II, an SDN-enabled spectrum auction mechanism is proposed for maximizing the social welfare based on the SUEs' service requirements of all participating RRHs from Tier-I. In this auction mechanism, the bipartite graph is utilized to determine the socially optimal winners and the price charging scheme is proposed inspired by the well-known Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction method. Simulation results reveal the performance and the benefits of the proposed SDN-enabled spectrum auction mechanism under different scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207