MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962922146 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.06834

Low-lying zeros of quadratic Dirichlet $L$-functions: A transition in\n the Ratios Conjecture

2017· article· en· W2962922146 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Fiorilli, James Parks, Anders Södergren

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjectureMathematicsQuadratic equationFunction (biology)Dirichlet distributionOrder (exchange)CombinatoricsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the $1$-level density of low-lying zeros of quadratic Dirichlet\n$L$-functions by applying the $L$-functions Ratios Conjecture. We observe a\ntransition in the main term as was predicted by the Katz-Sarnak heuristic as\nwell as in the lower order terms when the support of the Fourier transform of\nthe corresponding test function reaches the point $1$. Our results are\nconsistent with those obtained in previous work under GRH and are furthermore\nanalogous to results of Rudnick in the function field case.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207