1550-nm combined transmission booster amplifier and receiver preamplifier for satellite to satellite laser communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellite-to-satellite laser communication technology underpins high-speed l0-Gbps optical links for the new generation of satellite constellations that will serve as global telecommunications networks. LEO satellite-to-satellite links may extend over distances of >5000 km, necessitating an optical-power budget of ~70 dB to compensate for diffraction-limited opticalbeam divergence. This can be achieved by boosting the transmitted laser diode signal to around 1 W, and by amplifying the received signal by 40 dB. Such performances are attained by terrestrial fiber amplifiers, operating in the telecom 1550- nm wavelength window, which are produced in volume of thousands and are (in relative terms) of low cost. Based on MPBC’s large volume production experience of fiber amplifiers and its heritage of space system design and manufacturing, a new product line of Laser Communication Terminals (LCTs) for space is presented. It is designed to be lower cost, exploiting commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components whenever possible. Most of these fiber-optic components are extensively employed in large terrestrial telecom equipment and are already qualified to telecommunications standards. However, additional tests are required to ensure reliable long-term operation in a space environment. We have subjected the components, both active and passive, to gamma- and proton-radiation tests including total ionization doses of up to 100 kRad, Temperature vacuum cycling over extended temperature range have been performed and are still ongoing. Finally, considering manufacturing costs, we are packaging both the transmission optical booster unit and receiver optical amplification unit in the same housing, in order to co-locate both the transmit and receive functions of the link. These units are compact and stackable and save on the enclosure weight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".