Memory-access-aware Safety and Profitability Analysis for Transformation of Accelerator-bound OpenMP Loops
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iteration Point Difference Analysis is a new static analysis framework that can be used to determine the memory coalescing characteristics of parallel loops that target GPU offloading and to ascertain safety and profitability of loop transformations with the goal of improving their memory access characteristics. This analysis can propagate definitions through control flow, works for non-affine expressions, and is capable of analyzing expressions that reference conditionally defined values. This analysis framework enables safe and profitable loop transformations. Experimental results demonstrate potential for dramatic performance improvements. GPU kernel execution time across the Polybench suite is improved by up to 25.5× on an Nvidia P100 with benchmark overall improvement of up to 3.2×. An opportunity detected in a SPEC ACCEL benchmark yields kernel speedup of 86.5× with a benchmark improvement of 3.3×. This work also demonstrates how architecture-aware compilers improve code portability and reduce programmer effort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it