Joint convergence of random quadrangulations and their cores
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous montrons qu’une quadrangulation uniformément aléatoire, sa plus grande composante 2-connexe, et sa plus grande composante simple convergent conjointement en loi vers la même carte brownienne dans le sens Gromov–Hausdorff–Prokhorov. En premier, nous étendons l’analyse de (Random Structures Algorithms 19 (2001) 194–246) afin de démontrer un théorème limite local pour les tailles des plus grandes composantes. Les bornes sur les diamètres ainsi obtenues impliquent directement la convergence dans le sens Gromov–Hausdorff. Pour obtenir la convergence pour la topologie Gromov–Hausdorff–Prokhorov, nous prouvons que l’effet de l’attachement des masses sur l’objet limite est déterministe, si les masses sont attachées de manière échangeable et les masses sont uniformément asymptotiquement négligeables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it