Workers’ recovery from concussions presenting to the emergency department
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) is the first point of care for many patients with concussion, and post-concussion syndrome can impact vocational outcomes like successful return to work. Evaluation of concussion in general adult populations is needed. AIMS: To document the occurrence and outcomes of work-related concussion presenting to the ED for treatment. METHODS: This study enrolled adults presenting with concussion to three urban Canadian EDs. Baseline ED interviews, physician questionnaires and patient phone interviews at 30 and 90 days documented work-related events, ED management, discharge advice, patient adherence and symptom severity. Work-related injury and return to work were modelled using logistic or linear regression, as appropriate. RESULTS: Overall, 172 enrolled workers completed at least one follow-up. Work-related concussions were uncommon (n = 28). Most employees (80%) missed at least 1 day of work (median = 7; interquartile range: 3-14). Most (91%) employees returned to work within 90 days, while 41% reported persistent symptoms. Manual labour and self-reported history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were associated with work-related concussion, while days of missed work increased with marital status (divorced), history of sleep disorder and physician's advice to avoid work. CONCLUSION: Work-related concussions are infrequent; however, most workers who sustain a concussion will miss work, and many return while still experiencing symptoms. Work-related concussion and days of missed work are mainly affected by non-modifiable factors. Workers, employers and the workers' compensation system should take necessary precautions to ensure that workers return to work safely and successfully following a concussion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".