MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2963147498 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22607

Mathematical modelling of T‐cells activation dynamics for CD3 molecules recycling process

2016· article· en· W2963147498 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Qasim Ali, I.H. Mustafa, Ali Elkamel, Éric Touboul, Frédéric Gruy, Claude Lambert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD3PopulationProcess (computing)Biological systemComputer scienceT cellCell biologyChemistryBiophysicsImmune systemBiologyImmunologyCD8

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The down‐regulation of CD3 protein present on the surface of a T‐cell triggers the process of activation. A rapid decrease of CD3 from the surface is required to reach the threshold that is necessary for the continuation of the activation process. Using the flow cytometry technique, it is well established that an amount of down‐regulated CD3 proteins recycle and may appear on the surface of T‐cell. This article studies the impact of recycled CD3 protein that is recruited into the immune synapse at different rates. The population density of T‐cells is distributed over surface protein (CD3) concentration under the framework of population balance models by using a coupled system of PDEs. Such problems need non‐conventional population balance modelling so that classical numerical techniques can be applied. A recently developed efficient numerical method is validated against the analytical and numerical solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→