MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963150505 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.2485

Phase Transition of Tractability in Constraint Satisfaction and Bayesian\n Network Inference

2012· preprint· W2963150505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2012
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreewidthBayesian networkConstraint satisfaction problemInferenceConstraint satisfactionComputer scienceBounded functionRandom graphApproximate inferenceConstraint (computer-aided design)Bayesian probabilityTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceGraphProbabilistic logicPathwidth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been great interest in identifying tractable subclasses of NP\ncomplete problems and designing efficient algorithms for these tractable\nclasses. Constraint satisfaction and Bayesian network inference are two\nexamples of such problems that are of great importance in AI and algorithms. In\nthis paper we study, under the frameworks of random constraint satisfaction\nproblems and random Bayesian networks, a typical tractable subclass\ncharacterized by the treewidth of the problems. We show that the property of\nhaving a bounded treewidth for CSPs and Bayesian network inference problem has\na phase transition that occurs while the underlying structures of problems are\nstill sparse. This implies that algorithms making use of treewidth based\nstructural knowledge only work efficiently in a limited range of random\ninstance.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it