MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963175772 · doi:10.1785/0120190005

Generating Drift‐Free, Consistent, and Perfectly Spectrum‐Compatible Time Histories

2019· article· en· W2963175772 on OpenAlexaff
Lanlan Yang, Wei‐Chau Xie, Weiya Xu, B. L. Ly

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenfunctionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsAccelerationDisplacement (psychology)Mathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The focus of this article is on generating spectrum‐compatible acceleration, velocity, and displacement time histories for seismic analysis and design of engineering structures. If a generated acceleration time history is integrated to obtain the corresponding velocity and displacement time histories, it has been found that there are usually drifts in the resulting processes. Such drifts are due to overdeterminacy in the constants of integration. Baseline correction, although widely used, is not a suitable remedial measure to remove drift because it distorts the frequency content and renders the corrected processes no longer mutually consistent. The objective of this article is to develop an efficient and accurate method for generating drift‐free, consistent, and spectrum‐compatible time histories, which are essential properties for these time histories to be used as seismic input in time history analysis. To ensure drift‐free and consistent behavior, the eigenfunction method is applied to expand the time histories in eigenfunctions of a sixth‐order ordinary differential eigenvalue problem. The influence matrix method considering the influence of one frequency component on all others is capable of achieving perfect spectrum compatibility which has never been accomplished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207