MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963225177

Kinetic Data Structures for the Semi-Yao Graph and All Nearest Neighbors in $\mathbb{R}^d$.

2013· article· en· W2963225177 on OpenAlexaff
Zahed Rahmati, Mohammad Ali Abam, Valerie King, Sue Whitesides

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
Keywordsk-nearest neighbors algorithmGraphNearest neighbor graphMathematicsCombinatoricsKinetic energyComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents kinetic data structures (KDS’s) for maintaining the Semi-Yao graph, all the nearest neighbors, and all the (1 + )-nearest neighbors of a set of moving points in R. Our technique provides the first KDS for the SemiYao graph in R. It generalizes and improves on the previous work on maintaining the Semi-Yao graph in R. Our KDS for all nearest neighbors is deterministic. The best previous KDS for all nearest neighbors in R is randomized. Our structure and analysis are simpler and improves on the previous work. Finally, we provide a KDS for all the (1 + )-nearest neighbors, which in fact gives better performance than the exact KDS’s for all nearest neighbors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207